Saudi Arabia Puts Efforts Into Tapping Heavy-Oil Deposits

 

The Wall Street Journal has been slow to write about oil supplies (or lack thereof) for some time, so this is a big step.  The tone of the article seems accurate as well – no one is saying the world is running out of oil, but it sure might be running out of cheap oil.  And that means reconfiguring economies around new oil price paradigms.

Saudi Arabia Puts Efforts Into Tapping Heavy-Oil Deposits – WSJ.com.

Oil Prices versus Economic Growth

I think it’s safe to say we are all feeling the pinch of higher oil prices at the gas pump these days, but what does it mean for our overall economy?  This article discusses that point, and should provide pause for those who are skeptical of the power oil prices exert over the US economy as a whole.

Rising Oil Prices Beginning to Hurt Economy

This article has some good rule of thumb information on the relationship between the price per barrel of oil and it’s affect on economic growth. Any time you are talking about a 50-100 basis point decrease due to one single cause that should be of concern.

PAUL WISEMAN

WASHINGTON, Apr. 6, 2011 (AP Online delivered by Newstex) –

WASHINGTON (AP) — Just when companies have finally stepped up hiring, rising oil prices are threatening to halt the U.S. economy’s gains.

Some economists are scaling back their estimates for growth this year, in part because flat wages have left households struggling to pay higher gasoline prices.

Oil has topped $108 a barrel, the highest price since 2008. Regular unleaded gasoline now goes for an average $3.69 a gallon, according to AAA’s daily fuel gauge survey, up 86 cents from a year ago.

The higher costs have been driven by unrest in Libya and other oil-producing Middle East countries, along with rising energy demand from a strengthening U.S. economy.

Airlines, shipping companies and other U.S. businesses have been squeezed. The rising prices are further straining an economy struggling with high unemployment and a depressed housing market.

“The surge in oil prices since the end of last year is already doing significant damage to the economy,” says Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics.

Unlike other kinds of consumer spending, gasoline purchases provide less benefit for the U.S. economy. About half the revenue flows to oil exporting countries like Saudi Arabia and Canada, though U.S. oil companies and gasoline retailers also benefit.

For consumers, more expensive energy siphons away money that would otherwise be used for household purchases, from cars and furniture to clothing and vacations.

High energy prices are “putting a drain on consumer budgets,” says James Hamilton at the University of California, San Diego. “To the extent they’re having to spend more on gasoline, they have to make cutbacks elsewhere.”

Two-thirds of Americans say they expect rising gasoline prices to cause hardship for them or their families in the next six months, according to a new Associated Press-GfK Poll. The telephone poll conducted March 24-28 had a sampling error margin of plus or minus 4.2 percentage points.

Seventy-one percent say they’re cutting back on other expenses to make up for higher pump prices. Sixty-four percent say they’re driving less. And 53 percent say they’re changing vacation plans to stay closer to home.

“I try to leave the car parked at home all day Saturday,” says Curt Lindsay, who commutes an hour each way to his job as a computer systems administrator outside Washington, D.C. “I’d rather not spend the money on gasoline.”

Since gasoline prices topped $3 a gallon, Lindsay has also been trying to drive more slowly to conserve fuel.

His co-worker Albert Zaza canceled family trips to New York and Boston after the cost of filling up his Honda CRV surged from $35 to $47. Zaza spends four to five hours in traffic each day and has to fill up every other day.

Rising fuel prices are pinching businesses too.

In Tipton, Iowa, Grasshopper Lawn Care is tacking 5 percent onto customers’ bills to compensate for higher fuel costs. The company has to buy more than 8,000 gallons of gasoline a year. It plans to keep the surcharge until gasoline prices dip back below $3 a gallon, owner Dan Kessler says.

The oil shock and global instability are diluting the benefits of an improving job market. The unemployment rate, though still high, is at a two-year low. And the economy has just produced the strongest two months of hiring since before the recession began.

Bernard Baumohl, chief economist at the Economic Outlook Group, has slashed his estimate for growth this year to 2.8 percent from 3.5 percent. In 20010, the economy grew 2.9 percent.

Consumer spending accounts for about 70 percent of the economy. After adjusting for inflation and for seasonal factors, consumers spent 0.3 percent more in February than in January.

But that’s unlikely to last. Gasoline prices are surging just as inflation-adjusted incomes are falling. More expensive gas is draining much of the cash Americans are receiving from a cut in Social Security taxes this year.

Zandi estimates that higher oil prices shaved 0.5 percentage point from growth in the January-March quarter. He predicts the economy grew 2.6 percent during the quarter.

If oil prices average $100 a barrel for the year, Zandi says, growth will be 0.3 percentage point lower than if prices had stayed at last year’s level — an average of less than $80 a barrel. A few months of $125-a-barrel oil would slash economic growth by a full percentage point, Zandi says. And a few months at $150 a barrel could push the economy back into recession.

Surging oil prices don’t hurt everybody in the United States. Oil companies, for example, stand to gain. In 2008, Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE:XOM) earned $45 billion — a record for a U.S. company — after oil prices hit a record $150 a barrel.

Oil services companies such as Halliburton Co. (NYSE:HAL) , Schlumberger Ltd. (NYSE:SLB) and Baker Hughes Inc. (NYSE:BHI) also benefit as the oil industry rushes to find and produce more oil. And the products of biodiesel and other alternative energy companies become more competitive the higher oil prices go.

In a speech last week, Sandra Pianalto, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, offered hope that higher oil prices won’t persist long enough to do much damage.

“Large increases in food or energy prices tend to be temporary,” Pianalto said. “History shows that they are often followed by sharp declines.”

But Mark Pawlak, a market strategist at Keefe, Bruyette & Woods, says he worries about a repeat of what happened to the economy last year: It built momentum at the start of 2010, only to stall in the face of a European debt crisis and a run-up in oil prices from February to April.

Economic Optimism and Peak Oil

Back in 2005 the late Matt Simmons (author of Twilight in the Desert and a leading peak oil theorist) bet $5,000 that oil would be $200 per barrel (in 2005 dollars) in 2010.  While I think Mr. Simmons was being overly pessimistic about how high oil prices were headed, I applaud his boldness.

The following article notes that Mr. Simmons was wrong, and lost the $5,000 bet.  Of course that is true, although I would have liked to see where oil prices would have been at the end of 2010 if there was no worldwide economic crisis – one which no one predicted by the way.

But much more troubling is the authors optimistic view on oil and gas supplies.  I agree that betting against economic optimism is generally a losing deal.  Normally it seems there are only a handful of years in twenty where “dooms dayers” or “contrarians” are correct.  (Although if you have read the book The Black Swan and believe in it’s concepts you may not care if it is only a handful of years – its the magnitude that matters).  Human beings are by nature optimists, and one only needs to follow the stock market to see hope spring eternal.

However I would argue the author is confusing economic optimism with natural resource optimism.  This distinction is crucial because we can have an unlimited amount of economic growth for an unlimited amount of time (however unlikely) should that growth be fed by the proper resources.  But natural resources are finite – I cannot conjure up more oil and gas no matter how hard I try (although given a few million years I might be able to).  Moreover the large oil and gas finds the author refers to are all hard to access and harvest (think baking oil out of sand, deepwater drilling, and oil shale extraction).

Mr. Simmons may have been wrong in his prediction, but the point remains that our fossil fuel dependence to a great extent determines our economic fate.  How much oil and gas in the ground is irrelevant – it’s how much is available at the time it is demanded.  I would not be optimistic that oil supplies can be readily ramped up in less that five years from the point of need, if at all, and natural gas is of no help for one of the most crucial pieces of our economy – transportation, where switching from gasoline to natural gas fleets would be even more than a five year project.

Read the article here.

Esquire on the Budget Deficit

The Esquire Commission to Balance the Federal Budget was recently convened, and contained ELA board member Gary Hart.  Among other recommendations the Commission addressed two energy related policies: 1) the federal gasoline excise tax, and 2) biofuel subsidies.  ELA has noted the benefits of the gas tax before (read about it here), and it is generally accepted as the most efficient method of reducing gasoline use (and therefore carbon emissions) by economists.  However it is also generally accepted as political suicide by politicians!  Note the Commission muses over whether increased fuel efficiency could more than make up for the $1 price hike given the long and phase in approach they are advocating for the gas tax increase.

As for biofuel subsidies they have had a rough ride both up and down since the 1970′s, and any argument in eliminating them must take in to account the local jobs they create as well as the avoidance of creating national security issues (as with importing oil from countries we do not wish to be beholden to).  There is not an easy answer here, although in this authors opinion no subsidy should last forever – at some point biofuels must stand on their own.  Perhaps the $1 increase in the gasoline tax would provide enough pricing incentive for biofuels that the subsidy would no longer be needed.

Read the Commissions report here.